Case 1401569/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Wood v AND RJS Camper Van Conversions Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401569/2020
- Decision date
- 7 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Wood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the case under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. On that basis, it found that Mr K Wood was unfairly dismissed.
The tribunal also found that he was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. It quantified that award at £2,340.00, calculated as 4 x 1.5 x £390.00.
Separately, the claimant's breach of contract claim succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay four weeks' notice pay in the sum of £1,560.00. The combined monetary awards recorded in the judgment total £3,900.00.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Determined under Rule 21 after no valid response was presented. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment ordered in the sum of £2,340.00, calculated as 4 x 1.5 x £390.00. | Upheld | — | £2,340 |
| Breach of contract | Claim succeeded and the respondent was ordered to pay four weeks' notice pay of £1,560.00. | Upheld | — | £1,560 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,900
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.