Case 1401570/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Ewa Trop v AND The Arde Tree Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1401570/2024
- Decision date
- 6 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Ewa Trop
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined in chambers at Plymouth on 22 November 2024 under Rule 21 after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. Employment Judge N J Roper recorded that the respondent had not filed a valid response.
The tribunal found the claimant's breach of contract claim well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay four weeks' notice pay in the net sum of £832.80.
The tribunal also found the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction from wages well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £1,628.76. The judgment does not break the award down further beyond those two sums, and no discrimination or other statutory claims were recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the breach of contract claim well founded and ordered payment of four weeks' notice pay in the net sum of £832.80. | Upheld | — | £833 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the unlawful deduction from wages claim well founded and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,628.76. | Upheld | — | £1,629 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,462
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.