Case 1401571/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Hunter v Lorne Stewart plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401571/2021
- Decision date
- 11 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Hunter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Bristol hearing on 6 October 2022, Employment Judge Livesey decided that Mrs S Hunter was not disabled at the material time. On that basis, her complaints of discrimination on the grounds of disability were dismissed.
The judgment also records that the claimant’s remaining complaint of unfair dismissal was not decided at that hearing. It was to proceed in accordance with further directions once unavailable dates were provided within 7 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
No remedy was assessed in this judgment, and the written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing. The tribunal therefore made a final decision only on the disability discrimination complaints, leaving the unfair dismissal claim outstanding.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found that the claimant was not disabled at the material time, so the complaints of disability discrimination were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.