Case 1401583/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Kenealy, Solicitor For the v Dial A Carer (South West) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401583/2020
- Decision date
- 29 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richardson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Kenealy, Solicitor For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Bristol on 25 February 2021, Employment Judge A Richardson held that Ms E Cook’s claim of constructive unfair dismissal was well founded. The respondent did not attend. The appendix records that the dismissal date was 1 January 2020, the claimant had 2 years’ continuous service, and she began alternative employment with Lanhydrock Care on 29 January 2020.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a gross sum of £8,640.05, with the claimant to account to HMRC for PAYE deductions. The appendix breaks that figure down into a basic award of £1,300.25 and a compensatory award of £7,339.80. The compensatory element included two weeks’ statutory notice at £520.10 per week, two weeks’ loss of earnings for 15 to 29 January 2020, 20 weeks’ weekly loss at £245.63, and £350 for loss of statutory rights.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found the Claimant’s claim of constructive unfair dismissal well founded. The appendix records a gross award of £8,640.05, subject to PAYE deductions. | Upheld | — | £8,640 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,640
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,300
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,340
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.