Case 1401584/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Neville Smith-Daniels v Montpellier Land and Developments Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 1401584/2024
- Decision date
- 8 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Oliver Representation
- Venue
- By video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Neville Smith-Daniels
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent conceded the claims for holiday pay, unauthorised deduction from wages, and unpaid wages (breach of contract). The tribunal entered judgment for agreed sums of £2,899, £39,414.68, and £560 respectively.
The protected disclosure detriment complaint was dismissed because it was presented out of time and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been brought within time. The tribunal also found that the claimant's contract ended by resignation, but held that the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was well-founded.
The wrongful dismissal complaint was also well-founded, and the tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to seven weeks' notice. On compensation, the tribunal reduced the basic award by 25% because of the claimant's conduct before dismissal, said there was a chance he would have been fairly dismissed so any compensatory award should be reduced by 25%, and applied the Acas Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015 to the grievance, with a 15% increase for the respondent's unreasonable non-compliance. The tribunal found the claimant did not cause or contribute to the constructive dismissal by blameworthy conduct and also found a breach of the duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Respondent conceded this claim and the tribunal entered judgment for the agreed sum. | Upheld | — | £2,899 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent conceded this claim and the tribunal entered judgment for the agreed sum. | Upheld | — | £39,415 |
| Breach of contract | Judgment was entered for the agreed sum in respect of unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £560 |
| Whistleblowing | The detriment complaint for making a protected disclosure was dismissed as out of time; the tribunal held it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal held that the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was well-founded and that the claimant had resigned. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal held the wrongful dismissal complaint was well-founded and found the claimant was entitled to seven weeks' notice. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent breached its duty to give the claimant a written statement of employment particulars. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £42,874
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.