Case 1401588/2021 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr C Millward (2) Mr N Millward v Castleman EV Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401588/2021
- Decision date
- 19 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mr C Millward (2) Mr N Millward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claims were heard at a public preliminary hearing on 13 January 2022. The respondent did not attend and had filed no response, despite service at its registered office. The tribunal proceeded on the information supplied, principally by Mrs Millward, and entered judgments for both claimants.
For Mr C Millward, the tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered £2,913.82, made up of the December 2020 underpayment, January 2021 wages, and underpayments of £2 per hour for October to December 2020 after he was moved to another site. It also found a breach of contract in relation to notice and awarded £435.50, and found unpaid holiday entitlement and awarded £1,220.80.
The tribunal further found that Mr C Millward had not been given written particulars of employment in breach of section 1 ERA 1996 and awarded a further £1,680 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. It held that he was unfairly dismissed under section 104 ERA 1996 because he had asserted a statutory right, but no separate award was made for that claim. It also found that he had not been provided with itemised pay statements under section 8 ERA 1996, again with no separate award.
For Mr N Millward, the tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered £914.80, comprising the December 2020 underpayment and furlough-related payments for 18 December 2020 to 18 January 2021 and for 18 to 23 January 2021. It also held that he was unfairly dismissed under section 104 ERA 1996, with no separate award, and that he had not been provided with itemised pay statements under section 8 ERA 1996, again with no separate award.
Claims and outcomes
9 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross award for underpayments: £177.82 for December 2020, £1,680 for January 2021 wages, and £1,056 for £2/hr underpayments in October to December 2020 after a move to a different site. | Upheld | — | £2,914 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract as to notice; damages of one week's pay, described as a net sum. | Upheld | — | £436 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement, quantified as 95.2 hours. | Upheld | — | £1,221 |
| Other | Breach of section 1 ERA 1996 in failing to provide written particulars; award made under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,680 |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatically unfair under section 104 ERA 1996 for asserting a statutory right; no separate award was made. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide itemised pay statements under section 8 ERA 1996; no separate award was made. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross award for underpayments and furlough-related sums: £277.80 for December 2020, £509.60 for furlough pay for 18 December 2020 to 18 January 2021, and £127.40 for 18 to 23 January 2021. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,165
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 1 ERA 1996
- section 8 ERA 1996
- s.104 ERA 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.