Case 1401595/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Stuart McAuliffe v One Community — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401595/2023
- Decision date
- 20 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Representation
- Venue
- Bristol ET via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Stuart McAuliffe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Bristol Employment Tribunal on 1 September 2023, Employment Judge G. King recorded that Mr Stuart McAuliffe's claim against One Community was not well founded and was dismissed. The written record does not set out detailed reasons, findings of fact, or any remedy because the judgment was given orally at the hearing.
No monetary award was made or recorded in the written judgment. The document also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the decision being sent on 20 September 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written record states only that the claimant's claim was not well founded and was dismissed. The claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category provided in the case context; the judgment text itself does not restate the pleaded cause of action. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.