Case 1401611/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jeffrey Ward v Hand Picked Hotels Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1401611/2019
- Decision date
- 26 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jeffrey Ward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short written judgment in which Employment Judge J Bax recorded that the claimant, Mr Jeffrey Ward, orally withdrew his breach of contract claim during the case management preliminary hearing on 26 July 2019. The respondent was Hand Picked Hotels Limited, and the case was heard by telephone at Bristol Employment Tribunal on 27 July 2019.
Because the claim was withdrawn, the tribunal dismissed the breach of contract claim. The judgment does not contain findings on the underlying merits of the dispute and does not record any monetary award or other remedy.
The written record also states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No further substantive issues are set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant orally withdrew the breach of contract claim during the case management preliminary hearing on 26 July 2019, and that claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.