Case 1401670/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Isabelle Leach v AND Brundles Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401670/2020
- Decision date
- 9 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Isabelle Leach
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined in chambers on 9 June 2020 under Rule 21 after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. The claimant was Miss Isabelle Leach and the respondent was Brundles Limited.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim for breach of contract succeeded, her claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded, and her claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeded. No reasons are set out in the extracted text beyond those outcomes.
The tribunal did not assess remedy at this judgment stage. It stated that the appropriate remedy would be determined at a further hearing, and that notice would be sent in due course.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Judgment under Rule 21; remedy to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment under Rule 21; remedy to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded as a claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay; remedy to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.