Case 1401676/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Guy v Giant Professional Limited and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401676/2020
- Decision date
- 29 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emerton Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss H Guy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had written to the claimant on 19 June 2020 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the complaint against the Second Respondent should not be struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the complaint against the Second Respondent. The judgment is a partial strike-out judgment and does not record a decision on the complaint against the First Respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the complaint against the Second Respondent, Barclays Bank PLC, only, on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment does not determine the complaint against the First Respondent. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.