Case 1401677/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Grennan of Counsel For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401677/2017
- Decision date
- 21 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms M Rowntree, Mr J Williams
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss D Grennan of Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal at Exeter, before Employment Judge N J Roper sitting with Ms M Rowntree and Mr J Williams, recorded a judgment by consent on 21 January 2020. The tribunal stated that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
No substantive findings on the merits of the dispute were set out in the judgment text. The order also recorded that there was no order as to costs.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states only that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; the whistleblowing claim type is taken from the case listing context rather than the judgment text itself. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; the unfair dismissal claim type is taken from the case listing context rather than the judgment text itself. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.