Case 1401685/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Patel, Counsel The v Ms M Steed, Solicitor — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401685/2022
- Decision date
- 22 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goraj Representation
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Patel, Counsel The
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 16 August 2023, Employment Judge Goraj determined only the disability issue under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. Professor James O' Brien alleged disability and age discrimination against Solent University; the respondent conceded that he was disabled by reason of stress and anxiety from 20 November 2020, but not before then and not by reason of depression.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant had earlier episodes of anxiety and depression in 1997, further mental health issues in 2016/2017, and anxiety-related issues in October 2019. It was not satisfied, however, that those earlier episodes were shown to have had a substantial adverse effect on day-to-day activities or to amount to a long-term impairment for the purposes of the Act. It also rejected disability status for October 2020, finding the evidence unclear and noting that the claimant's impact statements tied the psychological effects to the redundancy process from November 2020 rather than October 2020.
The tribunal found that from 1 November 2020 the claimant had stress, anxiety and depression with a substantial adverse effect on sleep, concentration, eating patterns and socialising, and that this impairment was likely, viewed at that date, to last at least 12 months. It further found that depression, in addition to stress and anxiety, was established from 20 November 2020 to 23 December 2021, relying on the GP records, sick notes, the Talking Change assessment recorded in July 2021 as moderate depression and anxiety, and the GP letter dated 18 July 2023. No remedy was awarded because this judgment determined only the preliminary disability question.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary disability-status issue only. The tribunal found the claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 by reason of stress, anxiety and depression for the periods identified in the judgment; it did not determine liability for the substantive discrimination claims. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- substantial adverse effect
- long-term effect
- Goodwin v the Patent Office
- Kapadia v London Borough of Lambeth
- EHRC Code of Practice on Employment (2011)
- EHRC Guidance on matters to be taken into account in determining questions relating to the definition of disability (2011)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.