Case 1401687/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Uff v Roger Young Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401687/2020
- Decision date
- 11 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Uff
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 7 August 2020, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 21 May 2020 and because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 19 November 2020 was vacated and did not take place. The extracted text does not identify the underlying cause or causes of action, so the judgment is recorded as a struck-out claim without further specification.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying claim type(s); it states only that 'the claim is struck out' for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 21 May 2020 and because the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.