Case 1401708/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss F Marshall v AND Richard Language School Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1401708/2024
- Decision date
- 11 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss F Marshall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was entered under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. On the papers, the tribunal found that Miss F Marshall was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £8,690.25.
The tribunal also found the claimant's breach of contract claim well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay 12 weeks' notice pay in the net sum of £4,149.60. It upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim and ordered payment of £2,060.73 for unpaid wages and £903.84 for unpaid pension contributions, making £2,964.57 in total.
Finally, the tribunal found the claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay well-founded and ordered payment for 9 days' pay in the gross sum of £695.25. The awards stated in the judgment total £16,499.67.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £8,690 |
| Breach of contract | Order for 12 weeks' notice pay in the net sum of £4,149.60. | Upheld | — | £4,150 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award comprised unpaid wages of £2,060.73 and unpaid pension contributions of £903.84. | Upheld | — | £2,965 |
| Holiday pay | Award for 9 days' accrued but unpaid holiday pay in the gross sum of £695.25. | Upheld | — | £695 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.