Case 1401720/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Both in person For the v Poisedale Ltd (in liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1401720/2019
- Decision date
- 29 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emerton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Both in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Southampton on 29 November 2019, Employment Judge Emerton sitting alone determined the claims of Mr K Boczanowski and Mr T Perpeliev against Poisedale Ltd (in liquidation). The tribunal noted some ambiguity in its records about whether two listed claims were duplicates, but stated that each claimant effectively had one claim that needed to be determined.
The tribunal found that both claimants' claims of unauthorised deduction of wages were well founded. It held that they were contractually entitled to wages during the period when the respondent purported to lay them off without wages.
Mr Boczanowski's claim for holiday pay outstanding at termination was also well founded. Both claimants' breach of contract claims for unpaid notice pay were well founded. As to Mr Boczanowski, the tribunal recorded that he had already received a payment from the Insolvency Service representing unpaid notice pay, so it made no further order on that aspect.
In remedy, the respondent was ordered to pay Mr Boczanowski £1,680.00 gross for unauthorised deduction of wages and £310.15 gross for holiday pay. Mr Perpeliev was ordered to receive £2,500.00 gross for unauthorised deduction of wages and £1,120.00 for breach of contract in respect of notice pay. The tribunal noted that the latter sum would normally be calculated net, but a net figure could not be calculated at the hearing and the award was based on the gross contractual notice pay.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr K Boczanowski: claim for unauthorised deduction of wages during the period of lay-off without wages. | Upheld | — | £1,680 |
| Holiday pay | Mr K Boczanowski: claim for failure to pay holiday pay outstanding at termination. | Upheld | — | £310 |
| Breach of contract | Mr K Boczanowski: notice pay claim was well founded, but the tribunal made no further order because he had already received a payment from the Insolvency Service representing unpaid notice pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr T Perpeliev: claim for unauthorised deduction of wages during the period of lay-off without wages. | Upheld | — | £2,500 |
| Breach of contract | Mr T Perpeliev: claim for failure to pay notice pay; the tribunal ordered the sum gross and noted that a net figure could not be calculated at the hearing because of apparent overpayment of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,120 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,610
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.