Case 1401722/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Dincbilek v JJ Food Service Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401722/2022
- Decision date
- 16 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Scott Representation
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Dincbilek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Southampton on 18 May 2023, Employment Judge Scott heard the case between Mr C Dincbilek and JJ Food Service Ltd. The written judgment records that the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time, identified as 4 March 2022, because of depression and associated stress and anxiety.
The extracted record is a short oral judgment note and does not set out any further findings on liability, remedy, or legal reasoning beyond that disability-status finding. It records that the written judgment was dated 16 June 2023 and sent to the parties on that date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written record states that the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time, 4 March 2022, due to depression and associated stress and anxiety. The extracted text does not include any further liability or remedy finding. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.