Case 1401723/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Brown v Nodewell Farm Partners — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401723/2022
- Decision date
- 24 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cuthbert Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Bristol via video on 3 January 2023 before Employment Judge Cuthbert, the tribunal dealt first with the respondent's limitation objection. The claimant said he had worked for the partnership for many years and brought claims for unfair dismissal, unpaid holiday pay, a redundancy payment, and unpaid wages or notice pay. The respondent's case was that he had never been employed by it.
The tribunal found that Acas early conciliation ran from 20 April 2022 to 22 April 2022, that the ET1 was posted on 20 May 2022 and received by the tribunal on 23 May 2022, and that the relevant deadline was 22 May 2022. Applying section 111 ERA 1996 and the section 207B early conciliation extension, and referring to authorities including Wall's Meat Co v Khan, Porter v Bandridge Ltd, Palmer, Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser, Reed In Partnership Ltd v Fraine and Wolverhampton University v Elbeltagi, the tribunal held that the claim was one day late.
The claimant said he believed he had until 28 May 2022 and relied on his anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder and previous tribunal experience, but the tribunal found that the lateness resulted from a mistaken understanding of the deadline rather than any health-related impediment. It held that it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time, did not need to decide the second-stage reasonableness question, and dismissed all claims as out of time. It did not determine employment status or the merits, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim, including the pleaded £8,000 for lost earnings and £250 for loss of statutory rights, was dismissed as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The claim for a basic award or redundancy payment was dismissed as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claim for unpaid wages/notice pay was dismissed as out of time; the judgment did not separately classify it as breach of contract or unlawful deduction from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.111 ERA 1996
- s.207B ERA 1996
- Wall's Meat Co v Khan
- Porter v Bandridge Ltd
- Palmer and anor v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
- Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser
- Reed In Partnership Ltd v Fraine
- Wolverhampton University v Elbeltagi
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.