Case 1401728/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Poulton v RSPCA Isle of White Branch — 2019
- Case reference
- 1401728/2019
- Decision date
- 7 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Poulton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent indicated that it did not oppose the claim, and the tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 at Plymouth on 7 November 2019. The claimant’s claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay nine days’ pay in the gross sum of £985.50.
The judgment also records that the claimant’s age discrimination and disability discrimination claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. No findings on the merits of those discrimination allegations are stated in the judgment, and no separate remedy was awarded for them.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal upheld the claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay and ordered nine days' pay in the gross sum of £985.50. | Upheld | — | £986 |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the age discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the disability discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £986
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.