Case 1401730/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Mills, Lay Representative For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401730/2020
- Decision date
- 25 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mrs K Mills, Lay Representative For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing limited to time limitation. The claimant, Miss J Atkin, was dismissed by Cornwall Council for gross misconduct with effect from 1 November 2019 following allegations about breach of the Lifeline call handling procedure. She appealed, but the appeal was rejected and the outcome letter was dated 2 March 2020. The claim was presented on 3 April 2020 after early conciliation began on 30 March 2020.
The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim was out of time under section 111(2) ERA 1996. It held that the effective date of termination was 1 November 2019 and that the three-month time limit expired at midnight on 30 January 2020. Because the ACAS early conciliation process did not begin until 30 March 2020, section 207B did not give the claimant any extension of time.
The tribunal also rejected the argument that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time. It found that the claimant was not prevented from issuing proceedings by ill-health, ignorance of the process, bad advice, or any misrepresentation by the respondent. The tribunal accepted that she preferred to wait for the appeal outcome and was hopeful of reinstatement, but held that this did not satisfy the statutory test.
In a further alternative finding, the tribunal held that even if the primary time limit had been disapplied, the claimant did not issue proceedings within such further period as was reasonable after the appeal outcome on 2 March 2020. The claim was therefore dismissed as presented out of time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the claim was presented out of time. The effective date of termination was 1 November 2019, so the three-month limit expired on 30 January 2020. Early conciliation started on 30 March 2020 and the claim was presented on 3 April 2020, so section 207B did not extend time because ACAS was contacted after expiry of the primary limitation period. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.111(2) ERA 1996
- s.207B ERA 1996
- reasonably practicable test
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend-on-Sea BC
- Porter v Bandridge Ltd
- Wall’s Meat Co v Khan
- London Underground Ltd v Noel
- Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances
- Cullinane v Balfour Beattie Engineering Services Ltd
- Wolverhampton University v Elbeltagi
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.