Case 1401738/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Hodge v Transformations Care And Support Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401738/2020
- Decision date
- 22 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Hodge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Miss E Hodge against Transformations Care And Support Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £426.65.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £500.55. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £363.00.
The judgment records no further reasoning, no discrimination findings, and no other remedy components. Judgment was dated 5 October 2020 and sent to the parties on 22 October 2020.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; ordered to pay the gross/net sum stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £427 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £501 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £363 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,290
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.