Case 1401740/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M La Farge v Liphook Valet Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401740/2020
- Decision date
- 11 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M La Farge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss M La Farge's claim under rule 37. It recorded that by a letter dated 2 December 2020 the tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Livesey ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim and does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action. The GOV.UK listing for the case identifies unlawful deduction from wages, but that is not stated in the judgment text itself. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.