Case 1401749/2022 · Employment Tribunal
ASR v LQK Euro Car Parts Limited RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401749/2022
- Decision date
- 29 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge David Hughes
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ASR
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt this preliminary hearing in Southampton on 23 May 2023, Employment Judge David Hughes determined that the claimant was disabled within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found that the relevant disability period ran from 01.09.2021 to 02.12.2021.
The judgment states that the disability arose by reason of PTSD, a major depressive disorder, and anxiety. No other substantive liability findings are recorded in this short decision, and no monetary remedy is set out.
The record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. The written record was sent to the parties on 29 June 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal found the claimant was disabled within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010 from 01.09.2021 to 02.12.2021, by reason of PTSD, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.