Case 1401750/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Sim v CJ Carpentry and Joinery Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401750/2022
- Decision date
- 29 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Sim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 25 May 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Rayner determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £80.00 for one day’s unpaid work. The judgment also awarded £2,400.00 for 30 days when no work was available and £1,600.00 for unpaid holiday entitlement, producing a total award of £4,080.00.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment for one day’s unpaid work of £80.00. | Upheld | — | £80 |
| Other | The judgment awards £2,400.00 for 30 days due to no work being available; the extracted text does not give a specific legal label for this head of claim. | Upheld | — | £2,400 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £1,600.00. | Upheld | — | £1,600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,080
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.