Case 1401757/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Bennett v Clarion Collection Cheltenham and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401757/2020
- Decision date
- 24 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr B Bennett
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21. The tribunal found that the respondents had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered them to pay the gross sum of £2,250. It also found that the claimant had suffered losses in consequence of the non-payment referred to in paragraph 1, namely bank charges, and ordered the respondents to pay a further £30 under section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under Rule 21. Paragraph 1 awarded £2,250 for unauthorised deductions from wages; paragraph 2 awarded a further £30 for bank charges said to have been suffered as a consequence of the non-payment under section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act. | Upheld | — | £2,280 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,280
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,280
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.