Case 1401764/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Cullen v ConMed UK Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1401764/2019
- Decision date
- 16 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Cadney Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Cullen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge P Cadney at Bristol on 11 September 2019. The tribunal did not decide the underlying employment claims at this hearing. Instead, it adjourned the matter and re-listed it for 18 November 2019 with a three-hour time estimate.
The tribunal gave the claimant permission to serve draft amended particulars and/or grounds of complaint by 18 September 2019. No substantive findings were made about liability, dismissal, disclosure, or working time issues in this judgment.
The only monetary order recorded was that the claimant was ordered to pay the respondents' costs in the sum of £3,500 plus VAT, making £4,200 in total.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing only. No substantive liability findings were made; the hearing was adjourned and re-listed, the claimant was given permission to serve amended particulars and/or grounds of complaint, and a costs order was made against the claimant. | Other | — | £4,200 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,200
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.