Case 1401767/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Hartridge v HH Early Years Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401767/2022
- Decision date
- 7 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Hartridge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 27 May 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the wage claim, the tribunal found that HH Early Years Group Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Mrs L Hartridge’s wages and ordered the respondent to pay £608 gross.
On the contractual notice issue, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £152 gross in damages. The total award was £760 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £608 gross. | Upheld | — | £608 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £152 gross damages. | Upheld | — | £152 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £760
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.