Case 1401770/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Moodie v B.S. Steels Limited (in Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401770/2020
- Decision date
- 28 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Moodie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal recorded that the respondent's response was struck out. The tribunal had previously written to the respondent on 11 May 2021 giving an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the response should not be struck out, on the basis that the respondent had not complied with the tribunal's order of 10 April 2021 and that the matter had not been actively pursued.
The respondent did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the response. No substantive findings on liability for the underlying claim(s) are recorded in this judgment.
The tribunal noted that the respondent would still be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine the underlying substantive claims; it records only that the respondent's response was struck out after non-compliance with an order and lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.