Case 1401774/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Berry v Morrison Data Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401774/2021
- Decision date
- 23 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Date
- Panel members
- Ms R Hewitt-Gray, Ms P Skillen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Berry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that Morrison Data Services Limited unfairly dismissed Mr C Berry. It also recorded that, subject to the Polkey principle, compensation for loss of earnings was limited to one month.
The Tribunal dismissed the Claimant's claims of automatic unfair dismissal, discrimination arising from disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments. The written judgment does not provide detailed reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant the agreed sum of £11,116.00.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Respondent unfairly dismissed the Claimant and records an agreed payment sum, but does not break down the award. | Upheld | — | £11,116 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Claimant's claim of automatic unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed; the basis of the alleged automatic unfair dismissal is not specified in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claim of discrimination arising from disability failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The failure to make reasonable adjustments claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,116
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Polkey principle
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.