Case 1401775/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Phillips v Cafe Divino Swindon Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401775/2020
- Decision date
- 20 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Phillips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Midgley gave a Rule 21 judgment on 20 November 2020. The tribunal found that Cafe Divino Swindon Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr D Phillips's wages and ordered the respondent to pay £990 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £243.33.
The judgment further records that the respondent failed to provide the claimant with a contract of employment and ordered 4 weeks' pay of £1,320. The extracted text contains only these operative orders and does not set out additional reasoning or any separate apportionment of the awards.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £990 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £243 |
| Other | The judgment says the respondent failed to provide the claimant with a contract of employment and ordered 4 weeks' pay of £1,320. The extracted text does not specify a separate statutory or contractual label, so this is classified as other. | Upheld | — | £1,320 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,553
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.