Case 1401790/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Legutko v RTJ Automation and Maintenance Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401790/2020
- Decision date
- 3 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Legutko
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Dawson in which the Respondent did not enter a response. The tribunal therefore determined the claim on the papers and found in the Claimant's favour on all of the pleaded monetary claims.
The tribunal found that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,477.75 gross. It also found that the Claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,764.70.
In addition, the tribunal found that the Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,047.62. It further found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £357.39. The total amount awarded was £4,647.46.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,478 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,765 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,048 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £357 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,647
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.