Case 1401815/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Olaniyi v Bristol Royal Infirmary NHS Foundation Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401815/2019
- Decision date
- 1 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Olaniyi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the telephone hearing on 1 December 2020, Employment Judge Livesey recorded that the Claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because the deposits required by the Order of 19 October 2020 had not been paid. The same order was also the basis for dismissing the listed race discrimination complaints.
The race discrimination complaints dismissed at that stage were those identified in paragraphs 10.2.4, 10.2.5, 10.2.6, 10.2.7, 10.2.8, 10.2.10, 10.2.11 and 10.2.12 of the Order of 19 October 2020. The judgment does not determine those complaints on their merits; it records a procedural dismissal for non-payment of deposits.
The judgment also states that the balance of the Claimant's complaints would proceed in accordance with the Case Management Summaries and Orders of 19 October and 1 December 2020. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because the Claimant failed to pay the required deposits under the Order of 19 October 2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The race discrimination complaints identified at paragraphs 10.2.4, 10.2.5, 10.2.6, 10.2.7, 10.2.8, 10.2.10, 10.2.11 and 10.2.12 of the Order of 19 October 2020 were dismissed under rule 39(4) for failure to pay deposits. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.