Case 1401831/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Porteous v Id Ssc Limited and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401831/2022
- Decision date
- 23 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lambert Representation
- Venue
- Remotely
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr C Porteous
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by ID SSC Limited as a Trainee Multi-Sports coach from 5 October 2021 until 15 January 2022. The tribunal was satisfied that the claim documentation had been properly served on the first respondent, no responses had been received, and no respondent attended. It proceeded under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The complaints against the second and third respondents were dismissed on withdrawal after the claimant accepted that he had not been employed by them.
The tribunal accepted that Mr Donnelly emailed the claimant on 15 January 2022 saying the first respondent had financial difficulties and was ending employment with immediate effect. It found that the claimant remained owed sums for December 2021 wages, January 2022 wages, holiday pay and expenses. Those items were calculated at £1,589.93 in total, less £200 already received, and the tribunal ordered immediate payment of £1,389.93 from the first respondent. The judgment does not separately divide that final figure between the individual wage, holiday pay and expense components.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records a lump-sum payment for unpaid wages, holiday pay and expenses, calculated at £1,589.93 less £200 already received. It does not separately allocate the final amount between those heads. | Upheld | — | £1,390 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,390
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 ET Rules
- Rule 21 ET Rules
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.