Case 1401843/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Prof. L Oyedele v University of the West of England — 2024
- Case reference
- 1401843/2022
- Decision date
- 30 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Mrs Y Ramsaram, Mrs L Fellows
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Prof. L Oyedele
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Bristol over 9 to 14 and 16 September 2024, with Employment Judge J Bax sitting with Mrs Y Ramsaram and Mrs L Fellows. The claimant was represented by counsel and the respondent by counsel. The written record states that the tribunal dismissed the claim of discrimination on the grounds of race and dismissed the claim of unfair dismissal.
The judgment record does not set out the tribunal's reasons in writing because reasons were given orally at the hearing. It therefore records only the outcomes, not the underlying findings of fact or any remedy analysis. No monetary award is recorded.
The case was sent to the parties on 30 September 2024. The written note also states that written reasons will not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual procedure.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.