Case 1401865/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Southbourne Deli Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1401865/2024
- Decision date
- 11 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the case under Rule 21 after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. Sitting in chambers at Plymouth on 25 October 2024, Employment Judge N J Roper recorded that the claimant, Ewa Winter, was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment and that the respondent, Southbourne Deli Limited, had not filed a response.
The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £3,420.00, described in the judgment as 20 weeks x 1.5 at £114.00 gross per week. It also found that the claimant's breach of contract claim was well founded.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay 12 weeks' notice pay in the net sum of £1,368.00. The judgment does not record any separate award for interest or any other heads of loss beyond the redundancy payment and notice pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded at £3,420.00, calculated in the judgment as 20 weeks x 1.5 at £114.00 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £3,420 |
| Breach of contract | Claim succeeded and the respondent was ordered to pay 12 weeks' notice pay in the net sum of £1,368.00. | Upheld | — | £1,368 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,788
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.