Case 1401900/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Dawson Fibre Solutions Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401900/2019
- Decision date
- 16 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 10 January 2020 in Southampton, Employment Judge Gray proceeded under Rule 47 after the Respondent failed to attend or be represented. The Claimant, Mr T Pedersen, appeared in person, and the tribunal considered the information available before determining the claim in the Respondent's absence.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unlawful deduction from wages on a net figures basis and ordered the Respondent to pay £380. It also upheld the complaint that the Respondent had failed to provide a written statement of particulars of employment and ordered payment of £769.23, described in the judgment as two weeks' pay. The written record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal upheld the claim for unlawful deduction from wages on a net figures basis and ordered payment of £380. | Upheld | — | £380 |
| Other | Tribunal ordered payment of £769.23, described in the judgment as two weeks' pay, for failure to give a written statement of particulars of employment. | Upheld | — | £769 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,149
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.