Case 1401910/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ato Anderson v Qualasept Ltd t/a Bath ASU — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401910/2021
- Decision date
- 3 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Ms J Kaye, Mr H Launder
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ato Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Ato Anderson brought complaints of discrimination on the grounds of race and disability against Qualasept Ltd t/a Bath ASU. The case was heard at Bristol on 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 December 2022 before Employment Judge Livesey sitting with Ms J Kaye and Mr H Launder.
The tribunal dismissed both discrimination complaints. The written record does not set out the tribunal’s reasoning or any factual findings beyond the outcome, because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided in the written judgment record.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The written record states only that the complaint was dismissed; reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written record states only that the complaint was dismissed; reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.