Case 1401934/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Z Csatordai v NHS - Portsmouth (Clinical Commissioning Group) incl. CSU SCW, and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 1401934/2021
- Decision date
- 30 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss Z Csatordai
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy correspondence dated 16 July 2025 and 4 September 2025, the Tribunal asked the claimant to confirm whether she was pursuing the claim or withdrawing it. No response was received.
The Tribunal then sent a letter dated 1 October 2025 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated bases were non-compliance with the Tribunal's orders of 16 July 2025 and 4 September 2025, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no remedy or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying causes of action; it records that the claim was struck out because the claimant did not respond to correspondence, did not comply with the Tribunal's orders dated 16 July 2025 and 4 September 2025, and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the 1 October 2025 letter. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.