Case 1401940/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Rosser-Jacks v Testerworld Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401940/2022
- Decision date
- 11 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Rosser-Jacks
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a single-issue judgment in which the tribunal considered the claimant's complaint of failure to pay a redundancy payment. By a letter dated 20 October 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the complaint should not be struck out on the ground that it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the complaint of failure to pay a redundancy payment.
The judgment records Employment Judge Cadney Date as the judge, with the judgment sent to the parties on 11 November 2022. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal struck out the complaint of failure to pay a redundancy payment after giving the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 20 October 2022, to make representations or request a hearing on why the complaint should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.