Case 1401944/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Edginton v Cafe Divino Swindon Ltd t/a Brogans — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401944/2020
- Decision date
- 16 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Edginton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had entered a response in which the claim was not resisted, and judgment was therefore entered for the claimant. No factual dispute or reasons on liability are set out beyond that procedural basis.
The tribunal awarded the claimant £130.80 for unpaid holiday pay and £500 for breach of contract. The judgment does not break the award down further by statutory head, and it does not record any additional remedy components such as interest or compensation under separate labels.
The total sum awarded by the judgment is £630.80. The judgment was sent to the parties on 16 December 2021, and the judge named on the judgment is Employment Judge Cadney Date.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment records 'Unpaid Holiday Pay £130.80' as a sum awarded to the claimant under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £131 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records 'Breach of Contract - £500' as a sum awarded to the claimant under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £631
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.