Case 1401948/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Pokrywka v Meadows Visionplus Limited Heard by Cloud video — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401948/2019
- Decision date
- 25 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed
- Panel members
- Ms C Lloyd-Jennings, Ms F Robertson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Pokrywka
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs K Pokrywka’s case against Meadows Visionplus Limited was heard by Employment Judge Reed sitting with Ms C Lloyd-Jennings and Ms F Robertson on 17 to 19 May 2021 by Cloud video. The written judgment records that terms of settlement had been agreed and, by consent, the claim was dismissed upon the claimant’s withdrawal. No merits findings or factual conclusions about the underlying discrimination complaint are set out in the short written record.
The tribunal also made a costs order. It ordered the claimant to contribute £500 towards the respondent’s costs, to be paid by KL Law within 14 days of the order. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that terms of settlement had been agreed and, by consent, the claim was dismissed upon the claimant’s withdrawal. The substantive allegations are not set out in the written record. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.