Case 1401956/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Patrick Handzel v Eco Haus South West Limited and others — 2018
- Case reference
- 1401956/2018
- Decision date
- 2 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Patrick Handzel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claims against the second, third, fourth and fifth respondents were dismissed after the claimant withdrew them. It also records that the complaint that he had been dismissed for making a protected disclosure under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed against the first respondent on withdrawal.
No substantive liability findings are made in the extracted text, and no remedy or monetary award is recorded. The document is a short disposal judgment only, signed by Employment Judge Fowell Date on 2 November 2018.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claims against the second, third, fourth and fifth respondents were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; the extracted text does not identify the underlying claim type(s). | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The complaint of dismissal for making a protected disclosure under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 against the first respondent was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.