Case 1401966/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Hudson v Natures Way Foods Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401966/2020
- Decision date
- 24 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Hudson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered whether the claim should be struck out under rule 37. By letter dated 8 December 2020, the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Gray struck out the claim. The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim or record any remedy. The judgment is dated 1 February 2021 and was sent to the parties on 24 February 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action; it only records that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had no reasonable prospect of success and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.