Case 1401968/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Byrne v Reptasia Limited and 4 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401968/2022
- Decision date
- 16 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
6 namedClaimant
Miss K Byrne
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss K Byrne, brought claims against five respondents. At a hearing in Bristol by video on 3 March 2022, before Employment Judge Livesey, the respondents did not attend and the claimant appeared in person.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s claim of unlawful deductions from wages succeeded against the Fourth Respondent, The Finest Reptiles and Exotics Ltd, in the sum of £1,191. It also held that the claimant’s claim for unpaid holiday pay succeeded against the Fourth Respondent in the sum of £442.56.
All other claims against all other respondents were dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeding against the Fourth Respondent only; all other claims against all other Respondents were dismissed. | Upheld | — | £1,191 |
| Holiday pay | Succeeding against the Fourth Respondent only; all other claims against all other Respondents were dismissed. | Upheld | — | £443 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,634
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.