Case 1401973/2022 · Employment Tribunal
CARA PHELPS v The Midcounties Co-Operative Society — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401973/2022
- Decision date
- 21 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Oldroyd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
CARA PHELPS
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Cara Phelps, brought a claim under section 13 ERA 1996 seeking to recover an alleged unauthorised deduction of £295.36 from her final wages. The claim was heard by Employment Judge Oldroyd sitting alone at Exeter on 21 November 2022. The claimant represented herself and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal accepted that the final payslip of 8 April 2022 was confusing on its face. It showed pay for 39 hours at £9.23 per hour, a holiday pay adjustment of £57.94, and then a further deduction described as a “Basic Weeks Adjustment” of £295.36, leaving payment of £6.67. The claimant had reduced her contracted hours from 16 to 13 per week from 31 October 2021, and her employment ended on 17 March 2022.
The respondent’s evidence was that its payroll operated on a four-week cycle with a payroll cut-off date two weeks before the payslip issued, so part of each payment was estimated and then corrected on the next payslip. Ms Delargy explained that, because the claimant’s hours had reduced by less than 25%, she continued to be paid basic wages on the basis of 16 hours per week until the adjustment on the final payslip. On that account, the £295.36 deduction reflected the correction of previously estimated basic pay, with the later calculation then replacing it with actual hours worked and the relevant holiday adjustment.
The tribunal found that the deduction was one the respondent was contractually entitled to make. Although the payslip was accepted to be confusing, the tribunal was satisfied on the evidence that the deduction was authorised. The unlawful deduction from wages claim was therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant sought recovery of an alleged unauthorised deduction of £295.36 from her final pay. The tribunal found the deduction was contractually authorised and therefore not unlawful. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.