Case 1401974/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Y Mills v Waterfront Cars Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401974/2020
- Decision date
- 11 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Y Mills
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 10 November 2020, the tribunal gave Mrs Y Mills an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why her claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that she had not complied with the tribunal’s order dated 21 September 2020, which had been reminded on 17 October 2020, requiring her to provide a breakdown of the sums claimed from Waterfront Cars Ltd, that she had not replied to further reminder correspondence dated 2 December 2020, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mrs Mills did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations to avoid strike out, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings were made and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type(s). It records that the claimant had not complied with an order dated 21 September 2020 requiring a breakdown of the sums claimed, had not replied to reminder correspondence, and had not actively pursued the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.