Case 1401974/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Cooper & Wedlake Cuisine Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401974/2022
- Decision date
- 15 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend and was not represented at the video hearing. After considering the available information, the tribunal proceeded in the respondent's absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal held that the claimant succeeded in his claim for unauthorised deductions from wages. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,154.25, as set out in the claim form.
The holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons to be provided only if requested within the specified period.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant succeeded in his claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and orders payment of the gross sum of £1,154.25. | Upheld | — | £1,154 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim for holiday pay is dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,154
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.