Miss M L Koritsas v Mears Ltd — 2022

Case reference: 1401982/2022
Decision date: 29 December 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Leith Representation

Indexed: 20 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss M L Koritsas

Respondent

Mears Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the complaints of unfair dismissal, redundancy payment and disability discrimination were presented outside the applicable time limits.

Because the claims were out of time, the tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider them. Each of those complaints was therefore dismissed. The written judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal recorded that the complaint was presented outside the applicable time limit and that it therefore had no jurisdiction to consider it.	Dismissed	—	—
Redundancy	The tribunal recorded that the complaint was presented outside the applicable time limit and that it therefore had no jurisdiction to consider it.	Dismissed	—	—
Disability discrimination	The tribunal recorded that the complaint was presented outside the applicable time limit and that it therefore had no jurisdiction to consider it.	Dismissed	Disability	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.