Case 1401986/2022 · Employment Tribunal
1) Mrs S J Mckerrell 2) Mr D Jowsey v Westerleigh Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401986/2022
- Decision date
- 10 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1) Mrs S J Mckerrell 2) Mr D Jowsey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 24 October 2022, the tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimants did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearings fixed for 25 November 2022 and 17-20 January 2022 were vacated as a result. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text does not state the substantive claim label; this classification follows the case listing's unfair dismissal category. The tribunal struck out the claim(s) after the claimants did not make representations or sufficient representations in response to the 24 October 2022 letter about active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text does not state the substantive claim label; this classification follows the case listing's unfair dismissal category. The tribunal struck out the claim(s) after the claimants did not make representations or sufficient representations in response to the 24 October 2022 letter about active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.