Case 1401994/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Williams v Old Macmillan Company Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401994/2021
- Decision date
- 8 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lambert Representation
- Venue
- Remotely
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Lambert heard the case remotely on 11 March 2022. The tribunal held that the claimant's unlawful deductions complaints arising from a deduction of rent and from an alleged failure to pay for work carried out in relation to takeaways were not well founded and were dismissed.
The written record also states that complaints about failure to pay notice pay, failure to pay wages for February 2022, and failure to pay holiday pay were not determined at that hearing and were reserved to be listed for a rearranged hearing before the same judge. The record notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint arising out of a deduction of rent; dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint arising out of an alleged failure to pay for work carried out in relation to takeaways; dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.