Case 1402028/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Linford of Counsel For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402028/2022
- Decision date
- 9 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss J Linford of Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 16 October 2023 at Exeter, Employment Judge N J Roper recorded a judgment by consent in which the parties had agreed terms of settlement. The tribunal adjourned the case to allow those terms to be implemented.
The judgment states that if neither party applied to re-list the matter before 17 November 2023, the case would stand dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant as at that date. No findings on the merits of the sex discrimination or unfair dismissal claims were made in the text provided, and no monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Judgment by consent; the tribunal did not determine liability. The text records agreed settlement terms and states the case would stand dismissed on withdrawal if there was no application to re-list before 17 November 2023. | Settled | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment by consent; the tribunal did not determine liability. The text records agreed settlement terms and states the case would stand dismissed on withdrawal if there was no application to re-list before 17 November 2023. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.